| 翻訳と辞書 |
| O'Sullivan v Noarlunga Meat Ltd ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
O'Sullivan v Noarlunga Meat Ltd
''O'Sullivan v Noarlunga Meat Ltd'' (1954) 92 CLR 565 was a case decided in the High Court of Australia regarding the scope of the trade and commerce power, under s 51(i) of the Australian Constitution, and inconsistency between Commonwealth and State laws, under s. 109.
== Background ==
Noarlunga Meat Ltd was charged with contravening the ''Metropolitan and Export Abattoirs Act'' 1936 (SA), s 52a, because it did not hold a State licence for slaughtering stock. All premises outside the metropolitan area "for the purpose of slaughtering stock for export as fresh meat in a chilled or frozen condition" were required to obtain a licence from the State Agriculture Minister. However, the defendant company was registered under the ''Commerce (Meat Export) Regulations'' (Cth). Regulation 4B prohibited the exportation of meat unless an export permit had been granted, and regulation 5 required that all premises used for the slaughter of meat to be registered.
The defendant company argued that the State act was invalid by virtue of inconsistency with the Commonwealth regulations, which is dealt with in s 109 of the Constitution.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「O'Sullivan v Noarlunga Meat Ltd」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|